4.5 Article

Prognostic Impact of Statin Use in Patients With Heart Failure and Preserved Ejection Fraction - A Report From the CHART-2 Study -

期刊

CIRCULATION JOURNAL
卷 79, 期 3, 页码 574-U160

出版社

JAPANESE CIRCULATION SOC
DOI: 10.1253/circj.CJ-14-0865

关键词

Heart failure; Lipids; Noncardiovascular death; Statins; Sudden death

资金

  1. Ministry of Health, Labor, and Welfare
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [25330032] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: The effectiveness of statins remains to be examined in patients with heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (EF). Methods and Results: Among 4,544 consecutive HF patients registered in the Chronic Heart Failure Registry and Analysis in the Tohoku district-2 (CHART-2) between 2006 and 2010, 3,124 had EF >= 50% (HFpEF; mean age 69 years; male 65%) and 1,420 had EF <50% (HF with reduced EF (HFrEF); mean age 67 years; male 75%). The median follow-up was 3.4 years. The 3-year mortality in HFpEF patients was lower in patients receiving statins [8.7% vs. 14.5%, adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 0.74; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.58-0.94; P<0.001], which was confirmed in the propensity score-matched cohort (HR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.49-0.99; P=0.044). The inverse probability of treatment weighted further confirmed that statin use was associated with reduced incidence of all-cause death (HR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.62-0.82, P<0.001) and noncardiovascular death (HR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.43-0.66, P<0.001), specifically reduction of sudden death (HR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.36-0.98, P=0.041) and infection death (HR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.35-0.77, P=0.001) in HFpEF. In the HFrEF cohort, statin use was not associated with mortality (HR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.73-1.04, P=0.12), suggesting a lack of statin benefit in HFrEF patients. Conclusions: These results suggest that statin use is associated with improved mortality rates in HFpEF patients, mainly attributable to reductions in sudden death and noncardiovascular death.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据