4.7 Article

Modelling of marine radionuclide dispersion in IAEA MODARIA program: Lessons learnt from the Baltic Sea and Fukushima scenarios

期刊

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
卷 569, 期 -, 页码 594-602

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.06.131

关键词

Baltic Sea; Chernobyl; Fukushima Daiichi; Hydrodynamics; Dispersion model; Caesium

资金

  1. EU FP7 EURATOM project PREPARE: Innovative integrative tools and platforms to be prepared for radiological emergencies and post-accident response in Europe [323287]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant - Korean government (MSIP) [2012M2A8A4025912, 2012M5A1A1029210]
  3. CKJORC
  4. KIOST [PE99304]
  5. State Fund for Fundamental Research of Ukraine project Transfer of radioactivity between contaminated bottom sediment and the marine environment after Fukushima and Chernobyl accidents [68/12879]
  6. National Research Foundation of Korea [2012M2A8A4025912, 2012M5A1A1029210] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

State-of-the art dispersionmodelswere applied to simulate Cs-137 dispersion from Chernobyl nuclear power plant disaster fallout in the Baltic Sea and from Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant releases in the Pacific Ocean after the 2011 tsunami. Models were of different nature, from box to full three-dimensional models, and included water/sediment interactions. Agreement between models was very good in the Baltic. In the case of Fukushima, results from models could be considered to be in acceptable agreement only after a model harmonization process consisting of using exactly the same forcing (water circulation and parameters) in all models. It was found that the dynamics of the considered system (magnitude and variability of currents) was essential in obtaining a good agreement between models. The difficulties in developing operative models for decision-making support in these dynamic environments were highlighted. Three stages which should be considered after an emergency, each of them requiring specific modelling approaches, have been defined. They are the emergency, the post-emergency and the long-term phases. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据