4.7 Article

Lead and other toxic metals in playground paints from South West England

期刊

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
卷 544, 期 -, 页码 460-466

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.11.078

关键词

Playgrounds; Paint; Lead; Chromium; Health; Children

资金

  1. UoP Marine Institute grant

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Paints on surfaces of public playground structures in South West England have been analysed for Pb, Cr, Cd and Sb by field-portable, energy-dispersive XRF. Lead was detected (>8 mu g g(-1)) in 102 out of 242 cases, with concentrations ranging from 10 to 152,000 mu g g(-1) (median = 451 mu g g(-1)). Chromium was detected (>25 mu g g(-1)) in 48 cases, and concentrations ranged from 26 to 24,800 mu g g(-1) (median = 1040 mu g g(-1)) and exhibited a significant positive correlation with Pb concentrations. Antimony concentrations ranged from 273 to 16,000 mu g g(-1) (median = 2180 mu g g(-1)) in 56 detectable cases, and Cd was detected in eight paints and up to a concentration of 771 mu g g(-1) (median = 252 mu g g(-1)). The highest concentrations of Pb, Cr and Sb generally occurred in yellow or red paints but were encountered on a variety of structures and equipment (e.g. gates, flooring lines, railings and handles of climbing frames and seesaws, and the interior of a model train) and were observed in both flaking, extant paint and in formulations that appeared to have been recently applied. Maximum bioaccessible concentrations of Pb, Cr and Sb in a range of paints, evaluated in selected samples by ICP analysis following pepsin-dilute HCl extraction, were 2710, 205 and 23.6 mu g g(-1), respectively, or 16.6, 0.82 and 0.56% of the respective total concentrations. Total and bioaccessible concentrations of toxic metals in playground paints that exceed various contemporary and historical standards (and in many cases for Pb, by orders of magnitude) are likely to be a more widespread and pervasive issue that needs addressing by the relevant authorities. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据