4.7 Article

Biomagnification of mercury and selenium in two lakes in southern Norway

期刊

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
卷 566, 期 -, 页码 596-607

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.05.109

关键词

Mercury; Selenium; Stable isotopes; Bioaccumulation; European perch; Norwegian lakes

资金

  1. Norwegian Research Council
  2. University College of southeast-Norway

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We have investigated bioaccumulation and trophic transfer of bothmercury (Hg) and selenium (Se) in two lakes in southern Norway to reveal a suggested mitigating effect of Se on Hg biota accumulation. The study included analysis of total Se (Se), total Hg (Hg), and methyl-mercury (MeHg) in water, littoral and pelagic invertebrates and perch (Perca fluviatilis), together with stable isotope analysis (delta N-15 and delta C-13) in biota. Mean dissolved Se ranged from 22 to 59 ng L-1, while Hg and MeHg in lake water ranged from 1 to 3 ng L-1 and 0.01 to 0.06 ng L-1. Biota Se and Hg concentrations (dry weight) ranged from 0.41 mg Se kg(-1) and 0.06 mg Hg kg(-1) in primary littoral invertebrates and up to 2.9 mg Se kg(-1) and 3.6 mg Hg kg(-1) in perch. Both Hg and Se biomagnified in the food web, with a trophic magnification factor (TMF) of 4.64 for Hg and 1.29 for Se. The reported positive transfer of Se in the food web, despite the low measured dissolved Se, suggest that a major proportion of the Se in these lakes are both highly bioavailable and bioaccumulative. However, we did not find support for a Se-facilitated inhibition in the accumulation of Hg in perch, as Se and Hg concentrations in perch muscle correlated positively and Se did not explain any variations in Hg after we controlled for the effects of other important covariates. We postulate that this may be a result of insufficient concentrations of dissolved Se and subsequently in biota in our studied lakes for an efficient Hg sequestration up the food web. (C) 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据