4.7 Article

Exposure to oxychlordane is associated with shorter telomeres in arctic breeding kittiwakes

期刊

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
卷 563, 期 -, 页码 125-130

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.04.096

关键词

Seabirds; Svalbard; Contaminants; Organochlorines; PCBs; DNA

资金

  1. Institut Polaire Francais (IPEV project) [330, 2012 R03]
  2. Agence National de la Recherche (ANR) [ANR 10 CESA 0016]
  3. Research Council of Norway (AVITOX) [234423]
  4. University of La Rochelle
  5. Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) [ANR-10-CESA-0016] Funding Source: Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Telomeres are DNA-protein complexes located at the end of chromosomes, which play an important role in maintaining the genomic integrity. Telomeres shorten at each cell division and previous studies have shown that telomere length is related to health and lifespan and can be affected by a wide range of environmental factors. Among them, some persistent organic pollutants (POPs) have the potential to damage DNA. However, the effect of POPs on telomeres is poorly known for wildlife. Here, we investigated the relationships between some legacy POPs (organochlorine pesticides and polychlorobiphenyls) and telomere length in breeding adult black-legged kittiwakes (Rissa tridactyla), an arctic seabird species. Our results show that among legacy POPs, only blood concentration of oxychlordane, the major metabolite of chlordane mixture, is associated with shorter telomere length in females but not in males. This suggests that female kittiwakes could be more sensitive to oxychlordane, potentially explaining the previously reported lower survival rate in most oxychlordane-contaminated kittiwakes from the same population. This study is the first to report a significant and negative relationship between POPs and telomere length in a free-living bird and highlights sex-related susceptibility to banned pesticides. (c) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据