4.7 Article

Enzymatic and chemical mapping of nucleosome distribution in purified micro- and macronuclei of the ciliated model organism, Tetrahymena thermophila

期刊

SCIENCE CHINA-LIFE SCIENCES
卷 59, 期 9, 页码 909-919

出版社

SCIENCE PRESS
DOI: 10.1007/s11427-016-5102-x

关键词

nucleosome; micrococcal nuclease digestion; hydroxyl radical cleavage; Tetrahymena; micronuclei; macronuclei

类别

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [31522051, 31470064]
  2. Qingdao National Laboratory for Marine Science and Technology, China
  3. National Sanitation Foundation [MCB 1411565]
  4. National Institute of Health [R01 GM087343]
  5. Department of Pathology at the University of Michigan
  6. [15-12-1-1-jch]
  7. Direct For Biological Sciences [1411565] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  8. Div Of Molecular and Cellular Bioscience [1411565] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Genomic distribution of the nucleosome, the basic unit of chromatin, contains important epigenetic information. To map nucleosome distribution in structurally and functionally differentiated micronucleus (MIC) and macronucleus (MAC) of the ciliate Tetrahymena thermophila, we have purified MIC and MAC and performed micrococcal nuclease (MNase) digestion as well as hydroxyl radical cleavage. Different factors that may affect MNase digestion were examined, to optimize mono-nucleosome production. Mono-nucleosome purity was further improved by ultracentrifugation in a sucrose gradient. As MNase concentration increased, nucleosomal DNA sizes in MIC and MAC converged on 147 bp, as expected for the nucleosome core particle. Both MNase digestion and hydroxyl radical cleavage consistently showed a nucleosome repeat length of similar to 200 bp in MAC of Tetrahymena, supporting similar to 50 bp of linker DNA. Our work has systematically tested methods currently available for mapping nucleosome distribution in Tetrahymena, and provided a solid foundation for future epigenetic studies in this ciliated model organism.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据