4.3 Article

A demonstration of the application of the new paradigm for the evaluation of forensic evidence under conditions reflecting those of a real forensic-voice-comparison case

期刊

SCIENCE & JUSTICE
卷 56, 期 1, 页码 42-57

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.scijus.2015.06.005

关键词

Forensic voice comparison; Likelihood ratio; Validity; Reliability; Mismatch compensation

资金

  1. Australian Research Council
  2. Australian Federal Police
  3. New South Wales Police
  4. Queensland Police
  5. National Institute of Forensic Science
  6. Australasian Speech Science and Technology Association
  7. Guardia Civil through Linkage Project [LP100200142]
  8. Australian Government through the Department of Communications
  9. Australian Research Council through the ICT Centre of Excellence Program
  10. Australian Research Council [LP100200142] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The new paradigm for the evaluation of the strength of forensic evidence includes: The use of the likelihood-ratio framework. The use of relevant data, quantitative measurements, and statistical models. Empirical testing of validity and reliability under conditions reflecting those of the case under investigation. Transparency as to decisions made and procedures employed. The present paper illustrates the use of the new paradigm to evaluate strength of evidence under conditions reflecting those of a real forensic-voice-comparison case. The offender recording was from a landline telephone system, had background office noise, and was saved in a compressed format. The suspect recording included substantial reverberation and ventilation system noise, and was saved in a different compressed format. The present paper includes descriptions of the selection of the relevant hypotheses, sampling of data from the relevant population, simulation of suspect and offender recording conditions, and acoustic measurement and statistical modelling procedures. The present paper also explores the use of different techniques to compensate for the mismatch in recording conditions. It also examines how system performance would have differed had the suspect recording been of better quality. (C) 2015 The Chartered Society of Forensic Sciences. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据