4.8 Article

Cardiac Diseases Following Childhood Cancer Treatment Cohort Study

期刊

CIRCULATION
卷 133, 期 1, 页码 31-38

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.016686

关键词

anthracycline; childhood cancer; cohort studies; heart diseases; radiotherapy

资金

  1. Institut National for Cancer (INCA)
  2. Ligue Nationale Contre le Cancer (Equipe Labellisee Ligue)
  3. Fondation Force
  4. Program Hospitalier de Recherche Clinique (PHRC)
  5. Agence Francaise de Securite Sanitaire et Produit de Sante (AFSSAPS)
  6. Electricite de France (EDF)
  7. Pfizer Foundation for childhood and adolescent health
  8. PanCareSurFup Health FP7 [257505]
  9. ProCardio Euratom FP7 [295823]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Cardiac disease (CD) is one of the major side effects of childhood cancer therapy, but until now little has been known about the relationship between the heart radiation dose (HRD) received during childhood and the risk of CD. Methods and Results The cohort comprised 3162 5-year survivors of childhood cancer. Chemotherapy information was collected and HRD was estimated. There were 347 CDs in 234 patients, 156 of them were rated grade 3. Cox and Poisson regression models were used. The cumulative incidence of any type of CD at 40 years of age was 11.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 9.5-12.7) and 74% (95% CI, 6.2-8.9) when only the CDs of grade 3 were considered. In comparison with patients who received no anthracycline and either no radiotherapy or an HRD<01Gy, the risk was multiplied by 184 (95% CI, 7.1-48.0) in patients who had received anthracycline and no radiotherapy or a HRD <0.1Gy, by 60.4 (95% CI, 22.4-163.0) in those who had received no anthracycline and an HRD30Gy, and 61.5 (95% CI, 19.6-192.8) in those who had received both anthracycline and an HRD30Gy. Conclusions Survivors of childhood cancers treated with radiotherapy and anthracycline run a high dose-dependent risk of developing CD. CDs develop earlier in patients treated with anthracycline than in those treated without it.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据