4.8 Article

Nuclear envelope rupture and repair during cancer cell migration

期刊

SCIENCE
卷 352, 期 6283, 页码 353-358

出版社

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/science.aad7297

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIH [R01 HL082792, R01 NS059348, S10OD018516]
  2. Department of Defense Breast Cancer Research Program [BC102152, BC150580]
  3. NSF [CBET-1254846, ECCS-15420819, 1428922]
  4. National Cancer Institute, NIH, through the Cornell Center on the Microenvironment and Metastasis [U54 CA143876]
  5. NSF Graduate Research Fellowship [DGE-1144153]
  6. Netherlands Science Organization [NWO-VIDI 917.10.364, NWO-VICI 918.11.626]
  7. Cancer Genomics Center, Netherlands
  8. New York Stem Cell Foundation (NYSTEM) [CO29155]
  9. Radboud University Medical Center Microscopic Imaging Center and Preclinical Animal Imaging Center (PRIME)
  10. Direct For Biological Sciences
  11. Div Of Biological Infrastructure [1428922] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  12. Directorate For Engineering
  13. Div Of Chem, Bioeng, Env, & Transp Sys [1254846] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

During cancer metastasis, tumor cells penetrate tissues through tight interstitial spaces, which requires extensive deformation of the cell and its nucleus. Here, we investigated mammalian tumor cell migration in confining microenvironments in vitro and in vivo. Nuclear deformation caused localized loss of nuclear envelope (NE) integrity, which led to the uncontrolled exchange of nucleo-cytoplasmic content, herniation of chromatin across the NE, and DNA damage. The incidence of NE rupture increased with cell confinement and with depletion of nuclear lamins, NE proteins that structurally support the nucleus. Cells restored NE integrity using components of the endosomal sorting complexes required for transport III (ESCRT III) machinery. Our findings indicate that cell migration incurs substantial physical stress on the NE and its content and requires efficient NE and DNA damage repair for cell survival.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据