4.8 Article

Current Clinical Features of New Patients With Takayasu Arteritis Observed From Cross-Country Research in Japan Age and Sex Specificity

期刊

CIRCULATION
卷 132, 期 18, 页码 1701-+

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.012547

关键词

epidemiology; peripheral vascular diseases; physiopathology; Takayasu arteritis; vasculitis

资金

  1. Health Labour Sciences Research Grant for Intractable Diseases from the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background-The clinical features of newly diagnosed Japanese patients with Takayasu arteritis and its age or sex specificities are unknown. Methods and Results-We analyzed information from nationwide registration forms submitted by patients with Takayasu arteritis between April 2001 and March 2011 as part of a research program by the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare. Among the 7779 patients who submitted their forms, 1372 newly registered patients with Takayasu arteritis were enrolled; 83.8% were female. The median age at onset was 35 years, which was significantly higher in male patients (median, 43.5 years) than in female patients (median, 34 years; P<0.001). Local symptoms and findings were most commonly observed in the cervicobrachial area, with more complaints in the head or neck than in the upper limbs. Approximately 85% of the patients had vascular involvements in the aortic arch or its major branches; many young female patients had localized lesions. Although male patients had extensive aortic lesions or aneurysms with more complications, localized abdominal lesions were relatively more frequent in male patients with age at onset >40 years than in other age-sex groups. Disease statuses were severe in patients who registered at >= 1 year after onset. Conclusions-The proportions of male patients and patients with elderly onset increased in newly diagnosed patients with Takayasu arteritis. Their clinical and angiographic features differed according to onset age and sex.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据