4.8 Article

Higher-order organization of complex networks

期刊

SCIENCE
卷 353, 期 6295, 页码 163-166

出版社

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/science.aad9029

关键词

-

资金

  1. Stanford Graduate Fellowship
  2. NSF [CCF-1149756, IIS-1422918, IIS-1149837, CNS-1010921]
  3. trans-NIH initiative Big Data to Knowledge (BD2K)
  4. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency [XDATA]
  5. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency [Simplifying Complexity in Scientific Discovery (SIMPLEX)]
  6. Boeing
  7. Lightspeed
  8. Volkswagen
  9. Direct For Computer & Info Scie & Enginr
  10. Division of Computing and Communication Foundations [1149756] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  11. Division Of Computer and Network Systems
  12. Direct For Computer & Info Scie & Enginr [1010921] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  13. Div Of Information & Intelligent Systems
  14. Direct For Computer & Info Scie & Enginr [1422918] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Networks are a fundamental tool for understanding and modeling complex systems in physics, biology, neuroscience, engineering, and social science. Many networks are known to exhibit rich, lower-order connectivity patterns that can be captured at the level of individual nodes and edges. However, higher-order organization of complex networks-at the level of small network subgraphs-remains largely unknown. Here, we develop a generalized framework for clustering networks on the basis of higher-order connectivity patterns. This framework provides mathematical guarantees on the optimality of obtained clusters and scales to networks with billions of edges. The framework reveals higher-order organization in a number of networks, including information propagation units in neuronal networks and hub structure in transportation networks. Results show that networks exhibit rich higher-order organizational structures that are exposed by clustering based on higher-order connectivity patterns.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据