4.4 Article

Virtual shopping: A viable alternative to direct assessment of real life function?

期刊

SCHIZOPHRENIA RESEARCH
卷 172, 期 1-3, 页码 206-210

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2016.02.029

关键词

Schizophrenia; Functional outcome; Measurement

资金

  1. NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at the South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and King's College London
  2. NIHR Senior Investigator Award
  3. National Institute for Health Research [NF-SI-0514-10028] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: Real-life function is markedly impaired in schizophrenia and is an important outcome for interventions, but direct assessment is time consuming and resource intensive. Virtual reality (VR) enables assessment using simulation, akin to real life (RL), but allowing greater experimental control, reliability, and a more timely assessment. This study explores whether VR simulation predicts RL performance in supermarket shopping and how both relate to underlying cognitive abilities. Method: Forty three people with DSM-IV schizophrenia were included in the study. Participants were required to shop for items using a self-directed search in both RL and VR. In each task, accuracy (number of correct items) and efficiency (time taken and number of aisles entered) were measured. IQ, executive function, working memory, spatial memory and social cognition were also assessed. Results: Specific correlations were found between RL accuracy and VR accuracy, and between RL and VR efficiency measures. Multiple regression analyses indicated that VR efficiency measures contributed significant unique variance to RL efficiency outcomes, in addition to that explained by background cognitive measures, with a final model predicting 58% of variance in RL efficiency. Conclusions: VR functional shopping measures may enhance predictions of real life performance, over and above existing cognitive test procedures, and provide a more time-efficient method for evaluating real life outcomes. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据