4.5 Review

Heritability estimates of muscle strength-related phenotypes: A systematic review and meta-analysis

期刊

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/sms.12804

关键词

genetic factors; heredity; meta-analysis; muscle strength; systematic review

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology, Japan [15K01510]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [15H03081, 15K01510, 13J08000] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The purpose of this study was to clarify the heritability estimates of human muscle strength-related phenotypes (H-2-msp). A systematic literature search was conducted using PubMed (through August 22, 2016). Studies reporting the H-2-msp for healthy subjects in a sedentary state were included. Random-effects models were used to calculate the weighted mean heritability estimates. Moreover, subgroup analyses were performed based on phenotypic categories (eg, grip strength, isotonic strength, jumping ability). Sensitivity analyses were also conducted to investigate potential sources of heterogeneity of H-2-msp, which included age and sex. Twenty-four articles including 58 measurements were included in the meta-analysis. The weighted mean H-2-msp for all 58 measurements was 0.52 (95% confidence intervals [CI]: 0.48-0.56), with high heterogeneity (I-2=91.0%, P<.001). Subgroup analysis showed that the heritability of isometric grip strength, other isometric strength, isotonic strength, isokinetic strength, jumping ability, and other power measurements was 0.56 (95% CI: 0.46-0.67), 0.49 (0.47-0.52), 0.49 (0.32-0.67), 0.49 (0.37-0.61), 0.55 (0.45-0.65), and 0.51 (0.31-0.70), respectively. The H-2-msp decreased with age (P<.05). In conclusion, our results indicate that the influence of genetic and environmental factors on muscle strength-related phenotypes is comparable. Moreover, the role of environmental factors increased with age. These findings may contribute toward an understanding of muscle strength-related phenotypes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据