4.3 Article

Preterm birth in women with inflammatory bowel disease - the association with disease activity and drug treatment

期刊

SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY
卷 51, 期 12, 页码 1462-1469

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/00365521.2016.1208269

关键词

IBD; Crohn's disease; ulcerative colitis; pregnancy; preterm birth; IBD; inflammatory bowel disease

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: The inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD), Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) have been associated with an increased risk of preterm birth.Material and methods: We identified all 246 singleton preterm births among women with IBD between July 2006 and December 2010 as cases and an equal number of controls with IBD from the Swedish national health registers, matched by maternal age, parity and IBD diagnosis (CD/UC). From register data and medical charts, we obtained information on reproductive history, comorbidity, disease activity and drug treatment (corticosteroids, 5-aminosalicylates, sulfasalazine, thiopurines and anti-TNF) as risk factors for preterm birth. Associations were estimated using conditional logistic regression and results were presented as odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).Results: Previous preterm birth was more common among cases, OR 6.13 (95%CI: 2.51-15.01). Significant activity at any time during pregnancy (OR: 2.20; 95%CI: 1.37-3.53), and in particular both in early and in late pregnancy, was more common for cases (OR: 4.78 95%; CI: 2.10-10.9). The OR for immunosuppressive treatment with thiopurines or anti-TNF was 1.88 (1.04-3.39) without significant activity and 12.78 (95%CI: 3.68-44.72) with. The risk for women who discontinued thiopurines was 6.56 (1.44-29.82).Conclusions: Significant activity and immunosuppressive treatment was associated with preterm birth, particularly in women with both. The existing recommendations to aim at maintaining quiescent disease during pregnancy, even if it means continuing immunosuppressive treatment, are rational.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据