4.7 Article

A cost-effective and automatic surface defect inspection system for hot-rolled flat steel

期刊

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.rcim.2015.09.008

关键词

Automatic optical inspection (AOI); Feature extraction; Field programmable gate array (FPGA); Image enhancement; Hot-rolled steel strip

资金

  1. National Natural Science Funds of China [51577046]
  2. National Defense Advanced Research Project [C1120110004, 9140A27020211DZ5102]
  3. Anhui Provincial Science and Technology Foundation of China [1301022036]
  4. Key Grant Project of Chinese Ministry of Education [313018]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Defective steel brings economic and commercial reputation losses to the hot-strip manufacturers, and one of the main difficulties in using machine-vision-based technique for steel surface inspection is time taken to process the massive images suffering from uneven illumination. This paper develops a modular and cost-effective AOI system for hot-rolled flat steel in real time. Firstly, a detailed system topology is constructed according to the design goals covering the vast majority of steel mills, lighting setup and typical defect patterns are presented as well. Secondly, the image enhancement method is designed to overcome the uneven-lighting, over- or under-exposure. Thirdly, the defect detection algorithm is developed based on variance, entropy and average gradient derived from non-overlapping 32 x 32 pixel blocks of steel surface images. Fourthly, the proposed algorithms are implemented on FPGA in parallel to improve the inspection speed. Finally, 18,071 contiguous images (4096 x 1024 pixel) acquired from 7 defective steel rolls have been inspected by the realized AOI system to evaluate the performance. The experimental results show that the proposed method is speedy and effective enough for real applications in the hot-rolled steel manufacturing, with 92.11% average accuracy while 5.54% false-negative rate. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据