4.2 Article

Transposable elements and early evolution of sex chromosomes in fish

期刊

CHROMOSOME RESEARCH
卷 23, 期 3, 页码 545-560

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10577-015-9490-8

关键词

Sex chromosomes; Transposable elements; Fish

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [SCHA 408/12-1, SCHA 408/10-1]
  2. French Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR blanche seXYphophorus)
  3. French Agence Nationale de la Recherche [ANR-13-ISV7-0005 PHYLOSEX]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In many organisms, the sex chromosome pair can be recognized due to heteromorphy; the Y and W chromosomes have often lost many genes due to the absence of recombination during meiosis and are frequently heterochromatic. Repetitive sequences are found at a high proportion on such heterochromatic sex chromosomes and the evolution and emergence of sex chromosomes has been connected to the dynamics of repeats and transposable elements. With an amazing plasticity of sex determination mechanisms and numerous instances of independent emergence of novel sex chromosomes, fish represent an excellent lineage to investigate the early stages of sex chromosome differentiation, where sex chromosomes often are homomorphic and not heterochromatic. We have analyzed the composition, distribution, and relative age of TEs from available sex chromosome sequences of seven teleost fish. We observed recent bursts of TEs and simple repeat accumulations around young sex determination loci. More strikingly, we detected transposable element (TE) amplifications not only on the sex determination regions of the Y and W sex chromosomes, but also on the corresponding regions of the X and Z chromosomes. In one species, we also clearly demonstrated that the observed TE-rich sex determination locus originated from a TE-poor genomic region, strengthening the link between TE accumulation and emergence of the sex determination locus. Altogether, our results highlight the role of TEs in the initial steps of differentiation and evolution of sex chromosomes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据