4.3 Article

Use of electrospinning to construct biomaterials for peripheral nerve regeneration

期刊

REVIEWS IN THE NEUROSCIENCES
卷 27, 期 7, 页码 761-768

出版社

WALTER DE GRUYTER GMBH
DOI: 10.1515/revneuro-2016-0032

关键词

electrospinning; nanofiber scaffold; peripheral nerve regeneration

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51073024, 51273021]
  2. A973 [2014CB542201, 2012CB518106]
  3. Special Project of the 'Thirteenth Five-year Plan' for medical Science Development of PLA [BWS13C029]
  4. Special Project of the 'Twelfth-Five-year Plan' for medical Science Development of PLA [BWS11J025]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A number of limitations associated with the use of hollow nerve guidance conduits (NGCs) require further discussion. Most importantly, the functional recovery outcomes after the placement of hollow NGCs are poor even after the successful bridging of peripheral nerve injuries. However, nerve regeneration scaffolds built using electric spinning have several advantages that may improve functional recovery. Thus, the present study summarizes recent developments in this area, including the key cells that are combined with the scaffold and associated with nerve regeneration, the structure and configuration of the electrospinning design (which determines the performance of the electrospinning scaffold), the materials the electrospinning fibers are composed of, and the methods used to control the morphology of a single fiber. Additionally, this study also discusses the processes underlying peripheral nerve regeneration. The primary goals of the present review were to evaluate and consolidate the findings of studies that used scaffolding biomaterials built by electrospinning used for peripheral nerve regeneration support. It is amazing that the field of peripheral nerve regeneration continues to consistently produce such a wide variety of innovative techniques and novel types of equipment, because the introduction of every new process creates an opportunity for advances in materials for nerve repair.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据