4.5 Article

The effect of an oral anti-oxidant, N-Acetyl-cysteine, on inflammatory and oxidative markers in pulmonary sarcoidosis

期刊

RESPIRATORY MEDICINE
卷 112, 期 -, 页码 106-111

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.rmed.2016.01.011

关键词

Sarcoidosis; N-Acetyl-Cysteine; Oxidative stress

资金

  1. American Thoracic Society/Foundation for Sarcoidosis Research
  2. NIH/NCATS Colorado CTSA [UL1 TR001082]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Oxidative stress (OS) has been shown to play a role in the pathogenesis of sarcoidosis and previous studies have shown that anti-oxidants can reduce markers of oxidative stress and inflammation in the peripheral blood of sarcoidosis subjects. We investigated the effect of N-Acetyl-Cysteine (NAC) on oxidative stress and inflammatory markers in the lungs of sarcoidosis patients. Methods: We randomized 11 sarcoidosis subjects to active therapy and 3 to placebo for 8 weeks in a double blinded study. Bronchoscopy with bronchoalveolar lavage was performed pre and post therapy. Our primary endpoint was TNF-alpha production from stimulated and unstimulated BAL cells. Secondary outcomes included measures of oxidative stress (GSH, 8-OHdG) levels in the BAL. In-vitro studies were also performed to assess the effect of NAC on lipopolysaccharide stimulated BAL cell production of TNF-alpha. Results: Eight subjects in the active group and 2 in the placebo group completed the study protocol. Eight weeks of oral NAC did not have a significant impact on TNF-alpha levels from BAL cells in-vivo in spite of a 59% increase in BAL GSH levels. Our in vitro studies showed a significant decline in TNF-alpha production from LPS stimulated BAL cells treated with 5 and 10 mM of NAC. Conclusions: Oral NAC increased GSH levels but failed to suppress in-vivo TNF-alpha production in contrast to effects in-vitro. Anti-oxidant therapy may still play a role in the management of sarcoidosis but therapy with better bioavailability or potency is needed to suppress the lung inflammatory response. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据