4.5 Article

Prevalence and incidence of bronchiectasis in Catalonia, Spain: A population-based study

期刊

RESPIRATORY MEDICINE
卷 121, 期 -, 页码 26-31

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.rmed.2016.10.014

关键词

Bronchiectasis; Epidemiology; Treatment; Exacerbations

资金

  1. Bayer Pharma AG, Berlin (Germany)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Insufficient epidemiological data are available on bronchiectasis in southern European populations. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence and incidence of bronchiectasis in Catalonia, Spain and describe the characteristics of patients with an active diagnosis of bronchiectasis in 2012. Methods: This study used data from a population database containing information from 5.8 million people (80% of the population of Catalonia). Patients with bronchiectasis were identified using International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, 10th revision (ICD-10) codes, and information on clinical characteristics and treatment was extracted. Results: A total of 20895 patients with bronchiectasis were identified in 2012. The prevalence of bronchiectasis was 36.2 cases per 10 000 inhabitants, with an incidence of 4.81 cases per 10 000 inhabitants. Prevalence and incidence increased with age and were highest in men over 65 years of age. Among the whole bronchiectasis population in Primary Care, 48.6% of patients had had blood tests, 11.2% had undergone spirometry, only 2.1% had a chest X-ray, and 0.9% had undergone high-resolution computed tomography or sputum culture. 56% had at least one exacerbation and 12.5% had been admitted to hospital during the year of the study. The drugs most frequently used were inhaled corticosteroids (in 37.4% of patients) and long-acting beta(2)agonists (in 36%); half of the patients received no treatment (51.8%). Conclusions: The prevalence and incidence of bronchiectasis increases with age. The management of bronchiectasis in primary care was not optimal, and the disease continues to represent an important clinical burden. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据