4.5 Article

Prolonged occupational exposure leads to allergic airway sensitization and chronic airway and systemic inflammation in professional firefighters

期刊

RESPIRATORY MEDICINE
卷 118, 期 -, 页码 7-14

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.rmed.2016.07.006

关键词

Firefighters; Airway inflammation; Systemic inflammation; Allergic sensitization

资金

  1. Thorax Foundation
  2. Chiesi Hellas

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background and objectives: Little data exist on short- and long-term effects of occupational exposure on airway and systemic inflammation in professional firefighters. We aimed to characterize airway and systemic inflammation in training firefighters with a maximum occupational exposure of 1 year compared to the long-term exposure of professional firefighters. Methods: A questionnaire for symptoms and exposure, pulmonary function, atopy, bronchial hyper responsiveness, and markers of inflammation in induced sputum, serum, bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid and bronchial biopsies were assessed in a total of 92 firefighters (63 full-time professionals and 29 trainees). Results: Professional firefighters showed allergic bronchial sensitization documented by the presence of atopy, and eosinophilia in induced sputum, BAL and bronchial biopsies. IL-8, ECP, VEGF, and TNF-alpha levels were statistically significantly higher in the sputum supernatants of professional firefighters compared to the trainees (p = 0.04, p = 0.02, p = 0.04, and p = 0.02, respectively). Serum IL-8 and TNF-a levels were also statistically significantly higher in the group of professional firefighters (p = 0.04, p = 0.03, respectively). Finally, there was a linear correlation between the duration of the occupation in Service and the degree of airway and systemic inflammation. Conclusions: These results indicate a dose-response effect of chronic exposure to a polluted environment on bronchial and systemic inflammation in professional firefighters. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据