4.7 Article

Characterization of municipal solid waste collection operations

期刊

RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING
卷 114, 期 -, 页码 92-102

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.07.012

关键词

Collection; Municipal solid waste; Collection fuel efficiency; Collection distance; Collection time

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [CBET-1034059]
  2. Environmental Research and Educational Foundation
  3. Lonnie C. Poole/Waste Industries Scholarship through the Environmental Research and Education Foundation
  4. Div Of Chem, Bioeng, Env, & Transp Sys
  5. Directorate For Engineering [1437498] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Solid waste collection contributes to the cost, emissions, and fossil fuel required to manage municipal solid waste. Mechanistic models to estimate these parameters are necessary to perform integrated assessments of solid waste management alternatives using a life-cycle approach; however, models are only as good as their parameterization. This study presents operational waste collection data that can be used in life-cycle models for areas with similar collection systems, and provides illustrative results from a collection process model using operational data. Fuel use and times associated with various aspects of waste collection were obtained for vehicles collecting mixed residential (residual) waste, recyclables, and yard waste from single-family residences in selected municipalities. The total average fuel economy for similarly-sized diesel collection vehicles was 0.6-1.4km/L (1.4-3.3 mpg (miles per gallon)) for residual waste and 0.8-1 km/L (1.9-2.4 mpg) for recyclables. For residual waste and recyclables collection stops, the average time to collect at each residence using automated collection was 11-12 s and 13-17 s, respectively. The average time between stops was 11-12 s and 10-13 for residuals and recyclables, respectively. A single yard waste route was observed, and all collection times were longer than those measured for either recycling or residual waste. Unload or tip times were obtained or measured at a landfill, transfer station, and material recovery facility (MRF). Average time to unload was 7-9 min at a MRF, 14-22 min at a landfill, and 11 min at a transfer station. Commercial and multi-family collection vehicles tend to have longer stops and spend more time between stops than single-family collection, and a larger portion of fuel is used while driving relative to single-family collection. Roll-off vehicles, which collect more waste per stop, spend longer at each stop and drive longer distances between stops than front-loader vehicles. Diesel roll-offs averaged 2.4 km/L (5.7 mpg) and front-loaders averaged 1.4 km/L (3.3 mpg). (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据