4.5 Article

Stresses on Female Mice Impair Oocyte Developmental Potential: Effects of Stress Severity and Duration on Oocytes at the Growing Follicle Stage

期刊

REPRODUCTIVE SCIENCES
卷 23, 期 9, 页码 1148-1157

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/1933719116630416

关键词

repeated restraint stress; unpredictable stress; ovarian follicles; oocyte; mice

资金

  1. National Basic Research Program of China [2014CB138503, 2012CB944403]
  2. China National Natural Science Foundation [31272444, 30972096]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aim: Although previous studies found that 1-time acute stress applied during follicle maturation impaired oocyte competence, it is unknown whether repeated chronic stress, which is known to cause animal behavioral adaptation, would damage oocytes when applied during follicle growth. Methods and Results: In this study, female mice were exposed to repeated restraint stress (RRS) or unpredictable stress (UPS) for different days before equine chorionic gonadotropin injection to initiate oocyte prematuration development and to observe effects of different stressors on oocytes in the growing follicles. The results showed that although oocyte pre- and postimplantation development was unaffected when mice were exposed to RRS or UPS once a day for 4 days, development was impaired when mice were exposed to RRS for 8 or more days or to UPS twice a day for 4 days (4 x 2). The 4 x 2 UPS caused more oxidative stress in oocytes and severer apoptosis in antral follicles than did the 4-day RRS. The RRS mice were stressed consistently from days 1 to 23 of restraint, and the stress that a mouse had 4 x 2 UPS was severer than that from 4-day RRS. Conclusion: The results suggest that (1) the degree that a stress damages oocytes is the product of duration x severity of the stress; (2) RRS impaired oocyte developmental potential through cumulative effects on growing follicles; and (3) preantral follicles were not as sensitive to stress as antral follicles were.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据