4.7 Article

PV power conversion and short-term forecasting in a tropical, densely-built environment in Singapore

期刊

RENEWABLE ENERGY
卷 94, 期 -, 页码 496-509

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2016.03.075

关键词

PV power conversion; Solar irradiance forecasting; Short-term prediction; PV systems; Tropical regions

资金

  1. National University of Singapore (NUS)
  2. Singapore's National Research Foundation (NRF) through the Singapore Economic Development Board (EDB)
  3. NRF [NRF-CRP9-2011-06]
  4. Tractebel Energia under the ANEEL RD program
  5. Brazilian Scientific Research Council (CNPq)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

With the substantial growth of solar photovoltaic installations worldwide, forecasting irradiance becomes a critical step in providing a reliable integration of solar electricity into electric power grids. In Singapore, the number of PV installation has increased with a growth rate of 70% over the past 6 years. Within the next decade, solar power could represent up to 20% of the instant power generation. Challenges for PV grid integration in Singapore arise from the high variability in cloud movements and irradiance patterns due to the tropical climate. For a thorough analysis and modeling of the impact of an increasing share of variable PV power on the electric power system, it is indispensable (i) to have an accurate conversion model from irradiance to solar power generation, and (ii) to carry out irradiance forecasting on various time scales. In this work, we demonstrate how common assumptions and simplifications in PV power conversion methods negatively affect the output estimates of PV systems power in a tropical and densely-built environment such as in Singapore. In the second part, we propose and test a novel hybrid model for short-term irradiance forecasting for short-term intervals. The hybrid model outperforms the persistence forecast and other common statistical methods. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据