4.7 Article

Selection of the best pretreatment for hydrogen and bioethanol production from olive oil waste products

期刊

RENEWABLE ENERGY
卷 88, 期 -, 页码 401-407

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2015.11.055

关键词

Bioethanol; Hydrogen; Agro-food wastes; Physical and chemical pretreatments; Olive Pomace; Polyphenols

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bioethanol is one of the most promising renewable energy sources, and it can be used as an alternative to petroleum-derived products. Agro-food residues are the substrates most frequently used for bioethanol production through anaerobic fermentation. The cultivation of olive trees and olive oil production are important economic activities throughout all Mediterranean countries. The wastes derived from olive oil production include a liquid waste, known as Olive Mill Wastewater (OMW), and a semi-solid waste, called Olive Pomace (OP), which is rich is lignin and cellulose materials. The aim of this work is to evaluate the quantity of hydrogen and bioethanol that could be extracted from an OMW-OP mixture after Saccharomyces cerevisiae anaerobic fermentation. In addition, different pretreatments (ultrasonic pretreatment, basic pretreatment, and calcium carbonate addition) have been tested to increase the glucose concentration and, consequently, the bioethanol and hydrogen production in the reaction medium and to decrease the content of inhibiting polyphenols which are mainly present in the OMW. All of the pre treatments were shown to have improved the hydrogen and bioethanol concentration at the end of the fermentation. The basic and ultrasonic pretreatments resulted in the best bioethanol and hydrogen production. These two pretreatments contributed to the hydrolysis of the lignin and cellulose and to increasing the soluble sugars (in particular glucose) content in the reaction mixture. Calcium carbonate addition decreased the polyphenol concentration; the polyphenols inhibit the fermentation mediated by S. cerevisiae. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据