4.8 Review

Willingness to pay for green electricity: A review of the contingent valuation literature and its sources of error

期刊

RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS
卷 66, 期 -, 页码 875-885

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2016.08.054

关键词

Valuation methods; Literature review; Willingness to pay; Renewable energy; Elicitation techniques

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Although this method has important benefits, its validity and reliability are often criticised. This paper reviews the literature on the use of contingent valuation for measuring willingness to pay (WTP) for electricity generated from renewable energy sources (green electricity). A literature review, conducted on a sample of 57 peer-reviewed studies, shows that the vast majority of contingent evaluation studies stems from developed economies. Furthermore, most frequently used WTP elicitation techniques are open-ended and dichotomous choice approaches, which tend to produce varying levels of WTP. Studies dealing with the antecedents of WTP are predominantly inspired by the theory of reasoned action or by its extension, the theory of planned behaviour. This paper identifies six common errors in contingent valuation methods and discusses a number of remedies to deal with these errors in WTP research. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据