4.8 Review

Assessing the system and investor value of utility-scale solar PV

期刊

RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS
卷 64, 期 -, 页码 506-517

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2016.06.004

关键词

Solar PV; Energy economics; Policy analysis; Renewable electricity; Net present value; Production cost models

资金

  1. Electricity Research Centre's Industry Affiliates Programme
  2. Programme for Research in Third Level Institutions
  3. European Regional Development Fund (ERDF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

With pressure to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from the energy and other sectors, policymakers are increasingly seeking to mobilise investment in renewable electricity with support mechanisms. The objective of this paper is to assess the value of utility-scale solar PV using a multidisciplinary approach. In many cases renewable energy strategies are developed by investors and policymakers on the basis of a relatively narrow analysis of costs. However, as policies should be designed to maximise societal welfare, a wider paradigm is needed in decision-making. This paper argues for an impact assessment of renewable electricity generation that integrates its value from investor, utility, policy maker and end-user perspectives. We propose a multidisciplinary approach to the assessment, combining engineering production cost estimation with financial and market analysis of utility-scale solar PV in Ireland. The results show that while from an investor's perspective solar PV generation is, and will likely remain so for the foreseeable future, relatively expensive in a country with low solar irradiation such as Ireland, there are benefits for the electricity system in terms of reduced wind curtailment and, to a lesser extent, CO2 emissions. This demonstrates why the wider costs and benefits of integrating a renewable electricity technology to the system need to be considered in assessment of renewable policy support mechanism. Policy makers can then seek to maximise the system benefits while minimising the cost of any policy supports. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据