4.8 Review

Understanding household energy consumption behavior: The contribution of energy big data analytics

期刊

RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS
卷 56, 期 -, 页码 810-819

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.001

关键词

Household energy consumption behavior; Energy big data; Big data analytics; Energy informatics; Intervention strategies

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71501056]
  2. Anhui Provincial Philosophy and Social Science Planning Project [AHSKQ2015D42]
  3. Foundation for Innovative Research Groups of the National Natural Science Foundation of China [71521001]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [JZ2015HGBZ0093]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Understanding and changing household energy consumption behavior are considered as effective ways to improve energy efficiency and promote energy conservation. With the increasing penetration of conventional and emerging information and communication technologies (ICTs) in energy sector, traditional energy systems are being digitized. The energy big data provides a new way to analyze and understand individuals' energy consumption behavior, and thus to improve energy efficiency and promote energy conservation. We first propose a framework of the interdisciplinary research of energy, social and information science, which includes energy social science, social informatics and energy informatics. Then, different dimensions and different research paradigms of household energy consumption behavior are presented. Household energy consumption behavior can be analyzed in time dimension, user dimension and spatial dimension. The economic paradigm (including demand response) and the behavior-oriented paradigm (including intervention strategies) are two major research streams of household energy consumption behavior. Finally, the 4V characteristics (i.e., volume, velocity, variety and value) of energy big data are discussed. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据