4.5 Article

Correlation of bioelectrical impedance analysis phase angle with changes in oxidative stress on end-stage renal disease patients, before, during, and after dialysis

期刊

RENAL FAILURE
卷 38, 期 5, 页码 738-743

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.3109/0886022X.2016.1158042

关键词

Antioxidant capacity; dialysis; oxidative stress; phase angle

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Chronic kidney disease is a condition that promotes oxidative stress. There are conflicting evidence about the role of hemodialysis on oxidative stress, that are mostly related with the various types of membrane materials used, the quality and type of dialysate, the method used, etc. The phase angle (PhA), which is determined with bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA), measures the functionality of cell membranes. In this study, the correlation of the PhA with parameters of oxidative stress is attempted for the first time. We evaluated parameters of oxidative status as total antioxidant capacity (TAC) in erythrocytes (RBCs) and plasma of patients with ESRD undergoing hemodialysis with low flux synthetic polysulfone membranes. Measurements were recorded from 30 patients (16 men and 14 women) aged 64 +/- 14 years before, during, and after dialysis, and in 15 healthy volunteers aged 56 +/- 12 years The PhA was obtained by BIA. The plasma TAC increased significantly (41%, p<0.05). Intracellular TAC noted a non-significant increase. Total antioxidant capacity of the patients before and after hemodialysis was significantly lower from the healthy volunteers (p<0.05) showing that ESRD patients are at the state of increased oxidative stress. The PhA increased in significantly positive correlation with plasma TAC at the end of hemodialysis. The process of hemodialysis with biocompatible synthetic membranes and bicarbonate dialysate improved plasma TAC. The positive correlation of PhA with extracellular TAC could evolve to a method of oxidative stress estimation by BIA but further research is needed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据