4.7 Article

Land cover change detection by integrating object-based data blending model of Landsat and MODIS

期刊

REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT
卷 184, 期 -, 页码 374-386

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2016.07.028

关键词

Change detection; Object-based; Data blending; NDVI gradient difference; NDVI time series

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41501483]
  2. Research Foundation for Mapping Geographic Information Public Welfare of China [201512028]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Accurate information on land cover changes is critical for global change studies, land cover mapping and ecosystem management Although there are numerous change detection methods, pseudo changes can occur if data are acquired from different seasons, which presents a significant challenge for land cover change detection. In this study, land cover change detection by integrating object-based data blending model of Landsat and MODIS is proposed to solve this issue. The Estimation of Scale Parameter (ESP) tool under Minimum Mapping Unit (MMU) restriction is employed to identify the optimal scale for Landsat image segmentation. The Object Based Spatial and Temporal Vegetation Index Unmixing Model (OB-STVIUM) disaggregates MODIS NDVIs to Landsat objects using the spatial analysis and the linear mixing theory. Then, the change detection method of NDVI Gradient Difference (NDVI-GD) is developed to detect change and no-change objects considering the NDVI shape and value differences simultaneously. The results of the study indicate that the approach proposed in this study can effectively detect change areas when Landsat images are acquired from different seasons. OB-STVIUM is more suitable for change detection application compared with the Spatial and Temporal Adaptive Reflectance Fusion Model (STARFM) and NDVI Linear Mixing Growth Model (NDVI-LMGM), because it is less sensitive to the number and acquisition time of Landsat images. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据