4.7 Article

Detecting and quantifying oil slick thickness by thermal remote sensing: A ground-based experiment

期刊

REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT
卷 181, 期 -, 页码 207-217

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2016.04.007

关键词

Oil spill; Oil slick; Thickness; Thermal remote sensing; Brightness temperature; Diurnal temperature cycle model

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41371014, 41301360]
  2. Open Research Fund of the State Key Laboratory of Satellite Ocean Environment Dynamics (Second Institute of Oceanography, SOA) [SOED1608]
  3. U.S. Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM) [M12PC00003]
  4. Gulf of Mexico Research Initiative through the Center for Integrated Modeling and Analysis of Gulf Ecosystems (C-IMAGE) [SA 15-16]
  5. Open Research Fund of the Key Laboratory of Digital Earth Science, Institute of Remote Sensing and Digital Earth, Chinese Academy of Sciences [2013LDE005]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Thermal remote sensing has been used to detect oil slicks, yet estimation of slick thickness has largely remained unfeasible, mainly because the optimal detection time during a day, the minimum detectable thickness (MDT), and the relationship between the thermal response and thickness all remain largely unknown. Here, a ground based experiment is used to address some of these uncertainties. The experiment measured the brightness temperatures (BTs) of oil slicks (with different known thicknesses) and oil-free water as a function of time of the day for both clear and turbid waters. The BT differences (BTDs) between oil slicks and oil-free water were further simulated using a diurnal temperature cycle (DTC) model. The results demonstrate that: (1) for an oil slick that is in thermal equilibrium with the water, the optimal time for thermal detection is around local noon (positive BTDs) with midnight (negative BTs) being the next best time; the periods shortly before sunrise and after sunset are not suitable for the thermal detection of oil slicks; (2) a better linear relationship between slick thickness and BTD is found during daytime than night-time and the type of background water also plays a role in this; and (3) assuming a detection limit of 03 degrees C for a thermal sensor, the MDT at noon is approximately 40 mu m for both clear and turbid waters, while for other times of the day the MDT is higher (e.g., 75 and 150 pm for clear and turbid waters, respectively, at midnight). Detection limits for several existing satellite sensors and for other observation scenarios are also discussed. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据