4.7 Article

Hot deformation behavior and processing maps of Ti-15Al-12Nb alloy

期刊

RARE METALS
卷 41, 期 7, 页码 2316-2323

出版社

NONFERROUS METALS SOC CHINA
DOI: 10.1007/s12598-016-0699-2

关键词

Hot deformation; Processing map; Ti-15Al-12Nb

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study conducted isothermal hot compression tests on Ti-15Al-12Nb alloy and determined the optimum processing conditions to be within the temperature range of 1050-1100 degrees Celsius and strain rate range of 0.01-0.10 s(-1). It was also found that the dislocation density has a direct correlation with the processing efficiency.
The isothermal hot compression tests of Ti-15Al-12Nb alloy under wide range of strain rates (0.01-10.00 s(-1)) and deformation temperatures (950, 1000, 1050, and 1100 degrees C) were carried out using Gleeble-3500 thermo-simulation machine. A constitutive equation represented as a function of temperature, strain rate and true strain was developed, and the hot deformation apparent activation energy is calculated to be about 453 kJ center dot mol(-1). By employing dynamic material model (DMM), the processing maps of Ti-15Al-12Nb alloy at various strains were established. Maximum efficiency of about 57 % for power dissipation is obtained at high temperature and low strain rate. Owing to the high power dissipation efficiency and excellent processing ability in dynamic recrystallization (DRX) zone for metal material, the optimum processing conditions are selected as the temperature range of 1050-1100 degrees C and the strain rate range of 0.01-0.10 s(-1). Using transmission electron microscopy (TEM) studies, it is found that the dislocation density is directly associated with the value of processing efficiency. It is observed that when the processing efficiency is about 22 %, the dislocation density is reasonably large. The flow instability region occurs at strain rate of 10.00 s(-1) with cracks, which should be avoided during hot processing to obtain the required mechanical properties.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据