4.4 Article

Investigation on fragmentation pathways of bisphenols by using electrospray ionization Orbitrap mass spectrometry

期刊

RAPID COMMUNICATIONS IN MASS SPECTROMETRY
卷 30, 期 16, 页码 1901-1913

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/rcm.7666

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21505111, 21507106, 21437002]
  2. General Research Fund from the Research Grants Council (RGC) of Hong Kong, China [GRF 12301915]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

RationaleBisphenols, such as bisphenol A (BPA) and bisphenol S (BPS), are widely used in industrial products, although they have been demonstrated to be environmental contaminants with toxicity. However, few studies on the mass spectrometric fragmentation pathway of these compounds have been reported using high-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS). MethodsThe MS/MS fragmentations of nine bisphenols, together with several corresponding isotope-labeled compounds, were studied by Orbitrap MS using electrospray ionization (ESI) in negative ion mode and higher energy collisional-dissociation (HCD). The [M-H](-) ions of the compounds formed by ESI were selected as the precursor ions for MS/MS. The accurate m/z values for product ions were acquired to deduce the elemental compositions and fragmentation pathways. ResultsThe elemental compositions of the ions were calculated from the accurate mass data. Common MS/MS product ions and characteristic neutral losses were summarized. Six bisphenols formed the common product ion at m/z 93 (C6H5O). The [M-H](-) ions of five bisphenols were found to lose a phenol group (C6H5OH). Four bisphenols formed the [M-H-CH4](-) ion. The proposed fragmentation pathways of representative compounds of BPA and BPS were verified from the analysis of isotope-labeled compounds. ConclusionsThe MS/MS fragmentation pathways of nine bisphenols were, for the first time, systematically investigated with HRMS. The obtained data could be valuable for the identification of a variety of bisphenols in environmental and biological samples.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据