4.4 Article

Effect of surface capping of quantum dots (CdTe) on proteomics

期刊

RAPID COMMUNICATIONS IN MASS SPECTROMETRY
卷 30, 期 12, 页码 1403-1412

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/rcm.7575

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology of Taiwan

向作者/读者索取更多资源

RATIONALE: Investigation of nanoparticles for laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry (LDI-MS) is routinely reported. However, the effect of surface capping of nanomaterials for LDI-MS is not well studied. METHODS: Different capping agents of quantum dots (CdTe) affect the spectra quality and sensitivity of protein analysis and protein digestion using trypsin enzyme assisted by microwave. Surface modification of CdTe quantum dots with different capping agents, namely 3-mercaptopropionic acid (3-MPA), 4-aminothiophenol (4-ATP), 4-mercaptobenzoic acid (4-MBA), 11-mercaptoundecanoic acid (11-MUA), cysteine (Cys) and thioglycolic acid (TG), were investigated for quantum dots (QDs)-assisted trypsin protease followed by analysis using mass spectrometry. RESULTS: CdTe QDs were used as a surface to assist trypsin protease and laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry (surface-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry, SALDI-MS). The MS profiles for the investigated analytes (bovine serum albumin (BSA), lysozyme, cytochrome c, alpha-casein, transferrin and myoglobin) revealed almost the absence of degradation that implies the softness of the present technique. QDs-assisted LDI-MS offered high sensitivity and high resolution. QDs showed significant enhancement of microwave-assisted trypsin digestion of the investigated proteins and these improvements boosted the identifications of fragments with a database. CONCLUSIONS: A capping agent of quantum dots affects the analysis of proteins and peptides using LDI-MS. CdTe QDs offer sensitive, high-resolution and simple analysis of proteins. QDs improved the protein digestion using the microwave-assisted trypsin digestion. Copyright (C) 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据