4.7 Review

To live or let die: Unclear task of autophagy in the radiosensitization battle

期刊

RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY
卷 119, 期 2, 页码 265-275

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2016.02.028

关键词

Autophagy; Ionizing radiation; Radiotherapy; Radiosensitization; Inhibition; Induction

资金

  1. Ministry of Defense (A long-term organization development plan) [1011]
  2. Ministry of Education, Youth and Sport, Czech Republic [SV/FVZ201501]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Radiation-induced autophagy is believed to represent a radioprotective mechanism of cancer cells. Thus, its inhibition should support radiation treatment and increase its efficacy. On the other hand, there is evidence that radiation alone or in combination with various chemical agents can induce autophagy that results into increased cell death, especially within transformed apoptosis-resistant cells. In this paper, besides description of autophagic process and its relation to cancer and radiotherapy, we compared two contradictory radiosensitization approaches that employ inhibition and induction of autophagy. In spite of the classical concept based on cytoprotective model, there is a plethora of recently developed inducers of autophagy, which indicates the future trend in radiosensitization via modulation of autophagy. Because contemporary literature is conflicting and inconsistent in this respect, we reviewed the recent studies focused on enhancement of sensitivity of cancer cells toward radiation in regard to autophagy, revealing some striking discrepancies. The deeper the knowledge, the more complex this situation is. To interpret results of various studies correctly one has to take into account the methodology of autophagy assessment and also the fact that radiosensitization might be mediated by other than intrinsic mechanisms related to autophagy. Notwithstanding, targeting autophagy remains an attractive anti-tumor strategy. (C) 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据