4.7 Article

Quantification of dose uncertainties in cumulated dose estimation compared to planned dose in prostate IMRT

期刊

RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY
卷 119, 期 1, 页码 129-136

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2016.03.007

关键词

IGRT; Cumulative dose; Deformable image registration; Prostate; Phantom

资金

  1. French ANR within Investissement d'Avenir program (Labex CAMI) [ANR-11-LABX-0004]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background and purpose: In prostate IMRT, the objectives were to quantify, for the bladder and the rectum: (i) the dose difference (DD) between the planned dose (PD) and the estimated cumulated dose (ECD) by deformable image registration (DIR); (ii) the dose accumulation uncertainties (DAU). Materials and methods: A series of 24 patients receiving 80 Gy in the prostate was used to calculate the ECDpts and the DDpts. To evaluate the DAU, a numerical phantom (ph) simulating deformations of main pelvic organs was used to calculate the ECDph using the same DIR method. A reference cumulated dose (RCDph) was calculated, based on the simulated deformations. The DAU(ph) was defined by the differences between RCDph and ECDph. Results: For the mean dose to the bladder, the standard deviation of DDpcs was 6.9 Gy (18.1 Gy maximum) with a DAU(ph) of 2.7 Gy. For the rectum wall, it was 2.0 Gy (4.2 Gy maximum) with a DAU(ph) of 1.2 Gy. Volume differences between PDpt, and ECDpts, along the dose-volume histogram, ranged from -30% to +37% and -14% to +14% for the bladder and rectum, respectively. The corresponding uncertainties ranged from -23% to +7% and -4% to +7% for the bladder and rectum, respectively. Conclusions: Large differences between planned and delivered doses to the bladder have been quantified and are higher than the uncertainties of the DIR method. For the rectum, the differences are smaller and close to the DIR uncertainties. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据