4.7 Article

Reconstructing the retreat dynamics of the Bjornoyrenna Ice Stream based on new 3D seismic data from the central Barents Sea

期刊

QUATERNARY SCIENCE REVIEWS
卷 151, 期 -, 页码 212-227

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.quascirev.2016.09.003

关键词

Barents Sea Ice Sheet; Bjornoyrenna Ice Stream; Last Glacial Maximum; Mega-scale glacial lineations; Deglaciation

资金

  1. European Community [317217]
  2. Marie-Curie Actions [317217]
  3. Research Council of Norway through its Centres of Excellence funding scheme [223259]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The stability of contemporary ice sheets is influenced by the discharge from ice streams - corridors of fast-flowing ice bounded by ice flowing an order of magnitude slower. Reconstructions of palaeo-ice stream dynamics contribute to our understanding of ice stream sensitivity to the ocean-climate system and can aid in the numerical modelling and prediction of future changes in contemporary ice sheets. Here we use 3D seismic data, covering 13,000 km(2) in the central Bjornoyrenna (Bear Island Trough), Barents Sea, to investigate the record of ice streaming preserved on the seafloor and on a buried palaeo-seafloor surface. The unusually broad coverage and high resolution of the dataset, as well as its location in the central area of the trough, enables improved reconstruction of dynamics of the former Bjornoyrenna Ice Stream in terms of number of streaming events,their trajectory, and their relative age sequence during deglaciation. Our results reveal major changes in the configuration and flow dynamics of the ice stream, with up to 10 flow-switching events identified. For the first time, we also document ice streaming sourced from the eastern Barents Sea around the time of the LGM. This high degree of flow variability is suggested to have resulted from climate-driven changes in ice sheet geometry (and ice divide migration), and variations in topography that influenced calving at the ice stream terminus. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据