4.4 Article

The emergence of the Neolithic in North Africa: A new model for the Eastern Maghreb

期刊

QUATERNARY INTERNATIONAL
卷 410, 期 -, 页码 123-143

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.quaint.2015.11.089

关键词

Upper Capsian; Neolithic; Economy; Pottery; Radiocarbon dating; Tunisia

资金

  1. Italian Foreign Affairs Ministry
  2. University La Sapienza of Rome
  3. CNRS InSHS committee
  4. PALEOPLANT project ERC [CoG 614960]
  5. Labex BCDiv (Biological and Cultural Diversities) program
  6. ERC [CoG 614960]
  7. project Investissements d'avenir [ANR-11-IDEX-0004-02]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper is focused on cultural and subsistence changes in North African societies during the Early and Middle Holocene, with a special emphasis on the emergence of a productive economy in the Eastern Maghreb. An overview of Western Mediterranean Neolithic spread is first given in order to verify the trajectories evinced in European and North African contexts as well as the different models for neolithisation recently proposed in both contexts. A chrono-stratigraphical, economical and technological analysis carried out from coastal (SHM-1) and inland (Doukanet el Khoutifa and Kef Hamda) Tunisian sites is then proposed. New AMS dates offer insights on Upper Capsian development as well as on the Neolithic transition during the 9th and 8th millennium cal BP. Information gathered at SHM-1 and Kef Hamda indicates the acquisition of some specific Neolithic features such as decorated pottery in a hunter egatherer context dated to 8000 cal BP. Data from Doukanet el Khoutifa hint at a Neolithic productive economy from 7400 cal BP based on pastoral activities and integrating the consumption of wild animals and plants, with no evidence for agriculture. These data confirm the specific North African pathways identified in other local contexts, where an active role of Epipalaeolithic groups is at the basis of the Neolithic transition through an acculturation process. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd and INQUA. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据