4.6 Article

Why is changing health-related behaviour so difficult?

期刊

PUBLIC HEALTH
卷 136, 期 -, 页码 109-116

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.puhe.2016.03.030

关键词

Behaviour change; Public health; Psychological theory; Social practice; Non-communicable disease

资金

  1. Arts and Humanities Research Council [AH/M005917/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  2. Medical Research Council [MC_UU_12011/4, MR/N011848/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. AHRC [AH/M005917/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. MRC [MC_UU_12011/4, MR/N011848/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To demonstrate that six common errors made in attempts to change behaviour have prevented the implementation of the scientific evidence base derived from psychology and sociology; to suggest a new approach which incorporates recent developments in the behavioural sciences. Study design: The role of health behaviours in the origin of the current epidemic of non-communicable disease is observed to have driven attempts to change behaviour. It is noted that most efforts to change health behaviours have had limited success. This paper suggests that in policy-making, discussions about behaviour change are subject to six common errors and that these errors have made the business of health-related behaviour change much more difficult than it needs to be. Methods: Overview of policy and practice attempts to change health-related behaviour. Results: The reasons why knowledge and learning about behaviour have made so little progress in alcohol, dietary and physical inactivity-related disease prevention are considered, and an alternative way of thinking about the behaviours involved is suggested. This model harnesses recent developments in the behavioural sciences. Conclusion: It is important to understand the conditions preceding behaviour psychologically and sociologically and to combine psychological ideas about the automatic and reflective systems with sociological ideas about social practice. (C) 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of The Royal Society for Public Health.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据