4.7 Article

Neighbourhood characteristics and the incidence of first-episode psychosis and duration of untreated psychosis

期刊

PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE
卷 46, 期 7, 页码 1367-1378

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S003329171500286X

关键词

Duration of untreated psychosis; incidence; psychosis; schizophrenia; social deprivation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. The incidence of psychotic disorders varies between geographical areas and it has been hypothesized that neighbourhood-level factors may influence this variation. It is also plausible that the duration of untreated psychosis (DUP) is associated with neighbourhood characteristics. The aims of this study were to determine whether the incidence of first-episode psychosis (FEP) and the DUP are associated with the level of social deprivation, fragmentation, social capital and population density. Method. All individuals with a FEP from a geographical defined catchment area over a 5-year period were included. Age-standardized incidence rates were calculated for each neighbourhood factor. Results. A total of 292 cases of FEP were included in the study and 45% had a diagnosis of a schizophrenia-spectrum disorder. The age standardized incidence rate of FEP in the most deprived area was 72.4 [95% confidence interval (CI) 26.4-162.7] per 100 000 person-years compared with 21.5 (95% CI 17.6-26.0) per 100 000 person-years in the most affluent areas. This represents a 3.4-fold increase in FEP incidence in the most deprived areas. The incidence of FEP was also increased in neighbourhoods that were more socially fragmented [incidence rate ratio (IRR) = 2.40, 95% CI 1.05-5.51, p = 0.04] and there was a trend for the incidence to be increased in neighbourhoods with lower social capital (IRR = 1.43, 95% CI 0.99-2.06, p = 0.05). The median DUP was 4 months and was higher in more socially fragmented neighbourhoods. Conclusions. The incidence of psychotic disorders is related to neighbourhood factors and it may be useful to consider neighbourhood factors when allocating resources for early intervention services.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据