4.6 Review

Examining the relationship between multiple primary cancers and psychological distress: A review of current literature

期刊

PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY
卷 26, 期 12, 页码 2030-2039

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pon.4299

关键词

cancer survivorship; cancer-related distress; multiple primary cancers; oncology; psychological distress; subsequent malignancies

资金

  1. Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Future of Nursing Scholars program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

ObjectiveThe incidence of multiple primary cancers (MPCs) is increasing, but little is known about psychological distress in this population. The purpose of this study is to review and synthesize the literature regarding what is known about psychological distress in adults who have experienced MPC diagnoses. MethodsAll potentially eligible studies identified in PubMed and CINAHL were reviewed by 2 independent evaluators, and each relevant article was assessed for methodological quality. Data were extracted, organized, and recorded using a coding log, PRISMA flow diagram, and a standardized table of evidence. Effect size (ES) values were calculated using Cohen's d. ResultsFive of the 562 potentially relevant articles were selected for final analysis. MPC survivors, when compared with single cancer survivors, had lower global quality of life (d=0.32-0.37), poorer emotional role function and stress (d=0.08-0.20), greater and more frequent distress (d=0.11-0.37), and greater subclinical anxiety (d=0.15). Depressive symptoms were variable (d=0.01-0.22), and no differences between MPC and single cancer groups were identified for sleep and suicidal ideation. ConclusionThere is a substantial lack of evidence focused on psychological distress among the growing MPC survivor population. ES noted in the 5 studies reflect small but potentially significant increases in psychological distress in survivors of MPC compared with survivors of a single cancer. Clinicians should be aware of this at-risk population when screening for distress in cancer survivors. Suggestions for future research are provided.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据