4.2 Article

Divergent relationship of depression severity to social reward responses among patients with bipolar versus unipolar depression

期刊

PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH-NEUROIMAGING
卷 254, 期 -, 页码 18-25

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2016.06.003

关键词

Neuroimaging; Mood disorders; Magnetic resonance imaging

资金

  1. Brain and Behavior Foundation through Marc Rapport Family Investigator Grant
  2. Sidney R. Baer, Jr. Foundation
  3. Penn Medicine Neuroscience Center
  4. American Psychiatric Institute for Research and Education
  5. National Institute of Mental Health Grants [K23MH098130, K23MH085096, T32MH019112, R01MH10770, R01MH101111]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Neuroimaging studies of mood disorders demonstrate abnormalities in brain regions implicated in reward processing. However, there is a paucity of research investigating how social rewards affect reward circuit activity in these disorders. Here, we evaluated the relationship of both diagnostic category and dimensional depression severity to reward system function in bipolar and unipolar depression. In total, 86 adults were included, including 24 patients with bipolar depression, 24 patients with unipolar depression, and 38 healthy comparison subjects. Participants completed a social reward task during 3T BOLD fMRI. On average, diagnostic groups did not differ in activation to social reward. However, greater depression severity significantly correlated with reduced bilateral ventral striatum activation to social reward in the bipolar depressed group, but not the unipolar depressed group. In addition, decreased left orbitofrontal cortical activation correlated with more severe symptoms in bipolar depression, but not unipolar depression. These differential dimensional effects resulted in a significant voxelwise group by depression severity interaction. Taken together, these results provide initial evidence that deficits in social reward processing are differentially related to depression severity in the two disorders. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据