4.7 Article

Increased plasma asymmetric dimethylarginine is associated with cognitive deficits in patients with schizophrenia

期刊

PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH
卷 246, 期 -, 页码 480-484

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2016.10.015

关键词

Schizophrenia; Cognitive deficits; Asymmetric dimethylarginine; Plasma

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81560232, 81360211]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangxi Province of China [20151BBG70110]
  3. Heath and Family Planning Commission of Jiangxi Province of China [20157040]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cognitive deficits are a core feature of schizophrenia. Previous studies have shown that plasma asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA), an endogenous inhibitor of the nitric oxide synthase, was increased in patients with schizophrenia. This study aimed to investigate the association of ADMA with cognitive deficits in schizophrenia. Forty-seven patients with schizophrenia and 45 healthy control subjects were recruited in present study. Cognitive function was assessed with a neuropsychological battery including 7 neurocognitive tests. Schizophrenic symptoms were assessed using the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale and plasma ADMA concentration was measured by HPLC. We found that patients with schizophrenia exhibited poorer performances in nearly all of the cognitive tests except for the visual memory index compared with healthy controls. Plasma ADMA levels were significantly increased in patients with schizophrenia when compared to normal controls, and the mean ADMA concentration in patients with multiple episode schizophrenia was much higher than that of patients with first episode schizophrenia. For the patients, ADMA was negatively associated with attention, working memory and executive function in schizophrenia. These results suggest that ADMA may be involved in the pathophysiology of schizophrenia-associated cognitive impairments, and plasma ADMA could be a peripheral biomarker for evaluation of cognitive function in schizophrenia.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据