4.6 Article

A use of prototypic material for the investigation of severe accident progression

期刊

PROGRESS IN NUCLEAR ENERGY
卷 93, 期 -, 页码 297-305

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.pnucene.2016.09.003

关键词

Corium; Cold crucible; Steam explosion; Corium structural material interaction; Ablation

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea grant - Korean government (MSIP) [2012M2A8A4025885]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea [2012M2A8A4025885] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An experimental research platform using corium melts is established for the understanding of safety related important phenomena during a severe accident progression. The research platform includes TROI facility for corium water interaction experiments and VESTA facility for corium-structural material interaction experiments. A cold crucible technology is adapted and improved for a generation of 5 100 kg of corium melts at various compositions. TROI facility is used for experiments to investigate premixing and explosion behaviors during a fuel coolant interaction process. More than 70 experiments using corium at various compositions were performed to simulate steam explosion phenomena in a reactor situation. The results indicate that the conversion efficiency of steam explosion for corium is less than 1%. VESTA facility is used to investigate molten corium-structural material interaction phenomena. VESTA facility consists of two cold crucibles. One crucible is used for the melting of charged material and pouring of corium melt. The other crucible is used for the corium-structural material interaction while providing an induction heating to simulate the decay heat. The results of an experiment on the interaction between corium melt and a specimen made of Inconel performed in the VESTA facility is reported. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据