4.6 Article

Different forms of prefrontal theta burst stimulation for executive function of medication- resistant depression: Evidence from a randomized sham-controlled study

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2015.11.009

关键词

Medication-resistant depression; Theta-burst stimulation; Executive function; Brain stimulation; Cognitive function

资金

  1. Taipei Veterans General Hospital [VGHHUST101-G4-1-2, VGHHUST102-G4-3-1, V103B-007, V103E9-005, V104E9-003, V104B-002]
  2. Ministry of Science and Technology [MOST 103-2314-B-075-072-MY, 104-2325-B-039-004]
  3. Military Medical Bureau [DV103-12]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Even during symptomatic remission, many patients with medication resistant depression (MRD) still demonstrate impaired cognitive function, especially executive function (EF). Theta-burst transcranial magnetic stimulation (TBS) modulates cortical excitability and may treat MRD. Evidences from previous studies show that intermittent TBS (iTBS) produces cortical excitatory effects, while continuous TBS (cTBS) produces a reduction of cortical excitability. EF is highly dependent on prefrontal activity, but the effects of different forms of prefrontal TBS on EF remain unknown. Methods: 60 MRD patients were recruited and randomly assigned to one of four groups. Treatment was determined by the group to which an individual was assigned; A: cTBS 1800 pulses/session; B: iTBS 1800 pulses/session; C: a combination of cTBS + iTBS, 1800 pulses/session for each; and D: sham TBS. Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST) for the performance of EF was evaluated before and after 10 daily treatment sessions Results: Repeated measures ANOVA, with each WCST index at baseline and 2 weeks after TBS as within-subject factors, demonstrated that a statistically significant interaction of TBS groups (G) and antidepressant responses [(R), responses were defined as > 50% reduction of depression scores after 2-weeks TBS treatment] on the before-versus-after changes of all WCST indexes (G x R, p < 0.05). Responders in Group B, but not in the other groups, showed a significant improvement in WCST performance. Only nonresponders in Group A showed a trend for EF worsening. Conclusions: Our findings showed that left prefrontal iTBS, not right prefrontal cTBS, improved EF, and this can be independent from its antidepressant effects. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据