4.8 Review

Extraction of lithium with functionalized lithium ion-sieves

期刊

PROGRESS IN MATERIALS SCIENCE
卷 84, 期 -, 页码 276-313

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2016.09.004

关键词

Water lithium resources; Lithium ion-sieve technology; Lithium adsorbents; Lithium adsorption/desorption mechanisms; LIS batteries; LIS composite materials

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51374016]
  2. Beijing University of Chemical Technology (BUCT) Fund for Disciplines Construction and Development [XK1525]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [YS1406]
  4. Wyoming Engineering Initiative in the U.S.

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Due to the technology advancement and the large-scale application of lithium-ion batteries in recent years, the market demand for lithium is growing rapidly and the availability of land lithium resources is decreasing significantly. As such, the focus of lithium extraction technologies has shifted to water lithium resources involving salt-lake brines and sea water. Among various aqueous recovery technologies, the lithium ion-sieve (LIS) technology is considered the most promising one. This is because LISs are excellent adsorbents with high lithium uptake capacity, superior lithium selectivity and good cycle performance. These attributes have enabled LISs to separate lithium effectively from aqueous solutions containing different ions. The present work reviews the latest development in LIS technology, including the chemical structures of ion-sieves, the corresponding lithium adsorption desorption mechanisms, the ion-sieves preparation methods, and the challenges associated with the lithium recovery from aqueous solutions by the LIS batteries. Besides, some common LIS composite materials forming technologies, including granulation, foaming, membrane and fiber formation, and magnetization, which are used to overcome the shortcomings in industrial column operations, are also explored. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据