4.8 Review

Hybrid nanomaterials through molecular and atomic layer deposition: Top down, bottom up, and in-between approaches to new materials

期刊

PROGRESS IN MATERIALS SCIENCE
卷 75, 期 -, 页码 1-37

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2015.06.004

关键词

Molecular layer deposition; Atomic layer deposition; Hybrid materials; Organic/inorganic

资金

  1. Spanish ministry of economy and competitivity (MINECO) [MAT2012-38161]
  2. Basque Government [PI2013-56]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The ability to produce or alter materials to obtain drastically different or improved properties has been the driving goal of materials science since its inception. Combining multiple elements, compounds, or materials while maintaining the beneficial aspects of each constituent is a complex problem often involving highly interdisciplinary research. Hybrid materials, i.e. materials that incorporate organic and inorganic parts, have become popular in a variety of fields. Though not entirely new, the modern embodiment of hybrid materials has led to a large variety of new materials and techniques to produce them. One of the most recent being combination of atomic layer deposition (ALD), which produces inorganic materials, and molecular layer deposition (MLD), which produces organic materials. Furthermore, a variation on these techniques, commonly referred to as infiltration, has allowed for the modification of a variety of natural and synthetic polymers with surprising results related to their bulk mechanical properties. In this review three approaches are taken. First, hybrid materials through bottom-up combinations of ALD and MLD are reviewed, focusing on the process and properties of the resulting materials. Second, the modification of biomaterials through coating is discussed, and finally the relatively new concept of vapor phase infiltration is considered as a new and unique method to produce hybrid materials from a top down perspective. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据