4.3 Review

Rabbit models as tools for preclinical cardiac electrophysiological safety testing: Importance of repolarization reserve

期刊

PROGRESS IN BIOPHYSICS & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
卷 121, 期 2, 页码 157-168

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2016.05.002

关键词

Pre-clinical safety testing; Cardiac arrhythmias; Repolarization reserve; I-Ks; Species differences; Rabbit

资金

  1. Hungarian Scientific Research Fund [OTKA NN 110896, OTKA K 109610, OTKA NN 109904, OTKA NK 104397, OTKA NK 104331]
  2. National Office for Research and Technology - Baross Programme [REG-DA-09-2-2009-0115-NCXINHIB]
  3. Hungarian Academy of Sciences

向作者/读者索取更多资源

It is essential to more reliably assess the pro-arrhythmic liability of compounds in development. Current guidelines for pre-clinical and clinical testing of drug candidates advocate the use of healthy animals/ tissues and healthy individuals and focus on the test compound's ability to block the hERG current and prolong cardiac ventricular repolarization. Also, pre-clinical safety tests utilize several species commonly used in cardiac electrophysiological studies. In this review, important species differences in cardiac ventricular repolarizing ion currents are considered, followed by the discussion on electrical remodeling associated with chronic cardiovascular diseases that leads to altered ion channel and transporter expression and densities in pathological settings. We argue that the choice of species strongly influences experimental outcome and extrapolation of results to human clinical settings. We suggest that based on cardiac cellular electrophysiology, the rabbit is a useful species for pharmacological pro-arrhythmic investigations. In addition to healthy animals and tissues, the use of animal models (e.g. those with impaired repolarization reserve) is suggested that more closely resemble subsets of patients exhibiting increased vulnerability towards the development of ventricular arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据