4.8 Article

Persistent sulfate formation from London Fog to Chinese haze

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1616540113

关键词

sulfate aerosol; severe haze; pollution; human health; climate

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21190052]
  2. Strategic Priority Research Program of the CAS [41325014, XDA05100103, XDB05020401]
  3. Robert A. Welch Foundation [A-1417]
  4. Ministry of Science and Technology of China [2013CB955800]
  5. collaborative research program by Texas AM University
  6. National Basic Research Program, China Ministry of Science and Technology [2013CB228503]
  7. China Ministry of Environmental Protection's Special Funds for Scientific Research on PublicWelfare [20130916]
  8. National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship Program
  9. NASA Earth and Space Science Fellowship Program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Sulfate aerosols exert profound impacts on human and ecosystem health, weather, and climate, but their formation mechanism remains uncertain. Atmospheric models consistently underpredict sulfate levels under diverse environmental conditions. From atmospheric measurements in two Chinese megacities and complementary laboratory experiments, we show that the aqueous oxidation of SO2 by NO2 is key to efficient sulfate formation but is only feasible under two atmospheric conditions: on fine aerosols with high relative humidity and NH3 neutralization or under cloud conditions. Under polluted environments, this SO2 oxidation process leads to large sulfate production rates and promotes formation of nitrate and organic matter on aqueous particles, exacerbating severe haze development. Effective haze mitigation is achievable by intervening in the sulfate formation process with enforced NH3 and NO2 control measures. In addition to explaining the polluted episodes currently occurring in China and during the 1952 London Fog, this sulfate production mechanism is widespread, and our results suggest a way to tackle this growing problem in China and much of the developing world.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据