4.8 Article

Permissive roles of cytokines interleukin-7 and Flt3 ligand in mouse B-cell lineage commitment

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1613316113

关键词

hematopoiesis; cytokines; commitment; immunology

资金

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation
  2. People Programme (Marie Curie Actions) of the European Union's Seventh Framework Programme FP7 [315902]
  3. Science Foundation Ireland [SFI09/SRC/B1794, SFI07/SK/B1233b]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hematopoietic cells are continuously generated throughout life from hematopoietic stem cells, thus making hematopoiesis a favorable system to study developmental cell lineage commitment. The main factors incorporating environmental signals to developing hematopoietic cells are cytokines, which regulate commitment of hematopoietic progenitors to the different blood lineages by acting either in an instructive or a permissive manner. Fms-like tyrosine kinase-3 (Flt3) ligand (FL) and Interleukin-7 (IL-7) are cytokines pivotal for B-cell development, as manifested by the severely compromised B-cell development in their absence. However, their precise role in regulating B-cell commitment has been the subject of debate. In the present study we assessed the rescue of B-cell commitment in mice lacking IL-7 but simultaneously overexpressing FL. Results obtained demonstrate that FL overexpression in IL-7-deficient mice rescues B-cell commitment, resulting in significant Ebf1 and Pax5 expression in Ly6D(+) CD135(+)CD127(+)CD19(-) precursors and subsequent generation of normal numbers of CD19(+) B-cell progenitors, therefore indicating that IL-7 can be dispensable for commitment to the B-cell lineage. Further analysis of Ly6D(+)CD135(+)CD127(+)CD19(-) progenitors in IL-7-or FL-deficient mice overexpressing Bcl2, as well as in IL-7 transgenic mice suggests that both FL and IL-7 regulate B-cell commitment in a permissive manner: FL by inducing proliferation of Ly6D(+)CD135(+)CD127(+)CD19(-) progenitors and IL-7 by providing survival signals to these progenitors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据