4.8 Article

Improving our fundamental understanding of the role of aerosol-cloud interactions in the climate system

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1514043113

关键词

climate; aerosol-cloud effects; general circulation models; radiative forcing; satellite observations

资金

  1. US Department of Energy (DOE) [DE-AC06-76RLO 1830]
  2. US DOE Decadal and Regional Climate Prediction
  3. US DOE Earth System Modeling program
  4. NERC [NE/F019874/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/F019874/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  6. Directorate For Geosciences
  7. Div Atmospheric & Geospace Sciences [1048995] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The effect of an increase in atmospheric aerosol concentrations on the distribution and radiative properties of Earth's clouds is the most uncertain component of the overall global radiative forcing from preindustrial time. General circulation models (GCMs) are the tool for predicting future climate, but the treatment of aerosols, clouds, and aerosol-cloud radiative effects carries large uncertainties that directly affect GCM predictions, such as climate sensitivity. Predictions are hampered by the large range of scales of interaction between various components that need to be captured. Observation systems (remote sensing, in situ) are increasingly being used to constrain predictions, but significant challenges exist, to some extent because of the large range of scales and the fact that the various measuring systems tend to address different scales. Fine-scale models represent clouds, aerosols, and aerosol-cloud interactions with high fidelity but do not include interactions with the larger scale and are therefore limited from a climatic point of view. We suggest strategies for improving estimates of aerosol-cloud relationships in climate models, for new remote sensing and in situ measurements, and for quantifying and reducing model uncertainty.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据